The NYS Office of Cannabis Management recently issued a shocking reinterpretation of proximity rules that drastically redefine how far dispensaries must be from schools. Under the previous interpretation, retailers were prohibited from operating within 500 feet of a school entrance, a standard paralleling that of alcohol regulations. Regulators have now pivoted a complete 180, issuing that the distance is actually 500 feet from the school property line. This redefinition radically expands the restricted zone—placing several operating and ready-to-open stores in hot water. It’s a bureaucratic curveball that, for some retailers, could become a death sentence.
This reinterpretation came with little to no public warning, and was issued after many businesses had already invested heavily in securing leases, renovating storefronts, and gaining local approvals. These are not theoretical losses—dispensary owners have poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into meeting state requirements, only to be told the rules of the game have changed mid-play.
Nearly a dozen dispensaries have responded by suing the state over the sudden shift. Business owners argue that the change is not only unfair but potentially unlawful, pointing to the complete absence of public comment or legislative backing. They emphasize the reliance they placed on the original interpretation, which was published by the very agency now pulling the rug out from under them.
If upheld, the consequences could be devastating. Existing stores may be forced to relocate, shut down, or both, while pending licensees could lose their locations entirely—despite months (if not years) of planning, investment, and state-guided compliance. In every scenario, this new standard most heavily impacts social equity applicants, who typically have less access to capital and fewer resources to pivot under sudden policy reversals. For them, this isn’t just a setback—it’s potentially the end of the road.
The lawsuit—filed this August—claims that the Office of Cannabis Management exceeded its authority by redefining a zoning standard without due process or legislative action. While affected dispensaries have been granted temporary permission to remain open, their futures remain uncertain. Without new legislation or a rollback of this decision, many operators fear being forced out of the legal market altogether. And with the state legislature out of session until January 2026, those answers may not come any time soon.
But for many in the cannabis industry, this isn’t just a one-off problem—it’s part of a larger pattern of regulatory instability that has plagued New York’s rollout since day one. From licensing delays and inconsistent enforcement to ongoing battles with unlicensed sellers, legal operators say the policy environment feels increasingly reactive, inconsistent, and high-risk—especially for those without deep pockets or legal teams.
This latest proximity rule change isn’t just about real estate—it’s about regulatory trust. Entrepreneurs who followed every rule, sought approvals in good faith, and spent months building compliant businesses now find themselves punished for doing things the right way. Many feel abandoned by the very institutions meant to support an equitable, legal market.
As the regulated cannabis industry struggles to compete with entrenched unlicensed operations, New York simply can’t afford to lose more licensed dispensaries to bureaucratic whiplash. Every compliant store forced to shut down chips away at the credibility of the state’s cannabis program—and undermines the promise of a fair, inclusive, and transparent industry.
See more here